Divorce - Bates, Irene_3/24/1982�
STA'I� OF INDIF�IVA
SS
�IJN'I'Y OF GIBSON
�u a 1.� ua:, ca+ •
1 RF�� rAk�s ar,a
RUSSELi, J. Il:FmS
. � },
. . � �, IN 'Ii� GIB.SON CIF2CUIT OOCiFZI'
� F-� e!�, � 1980 TEFM
� � ��
) ��;;{ - 4 1980 �
� � � _
, , Cause No
)Cjr',"`.o�� .1��`��,r
)
� Clerk Gibson Clrcuit Cauri ��''
C-60-167
June 3, 1980
.\ .
�
NDC�'fE[VT ON DISSOU7PION OF MARRIAGE
Carres naa the Petitioner herein, Irene Iaros, in person and by her �unsel,
Dan L. F�eves, and it appearing to the Court that Petitioner's Petition for
Dissolution of said marriage having been filed on March 31, 1980, upon which
date surmnns was issued by the'Clerk of the Gibson Circuit Court for service
umn the,.husbanci and-'sezfi�ce of s�r.;�:s having ' �:na'.:e: '.iFen said h.•.isba�d-as
eviden�d by the return of simic�s, which said suremns and return _are _in the
words and figures as follaas, to-w��: .(H.I.) '
F�
And it further appearing to the�Caurt that more than sixty (60) days have
elapsed since this Petition was filed wit}i the Court, and the Respondent, Russell
J. Iaros, having failed to appear in this Cause in person or by munsel after•
being notified, is naa defaulted and now the Petitioner files Affidavit of Non-
Military Service pursuant to the Soldiers and Salors Civil Relief Act and this
cause being at issue the same is now sukinitted to the Court for hearing, finding
and decree without the intPSVe�tion of a jury.
Md the Court having heard the evidence in said Cause and being duly
advisecl in the premises finds as follv.�s:
1. That this Court has jurisdiction� of the parties hereto and of the sub-
ject matter and that the parties herein were m�.Yied on the llth day of November,
1973 and they separated on the 29th day of March, 1980, and have nat lived or
oohabited together sirice that date.
2. 1fie'Court further finds that the Petitioner was e resident of Gibson
County and the State of. L�iai:a on "L=rcli 31, 1°.80, :t:e d'ate of the.fili.og.,of .the.,�,,
Petition herein, and that she was continuous resident of Gibson County and the
State of Indiana for rture than six (6) m�nths itmiecliately prior to said date.
3. The Cour`•t'further finds that there were no children born to this
�rarriage and that the wife is not nd+r pregnant.
r ' .
4. 'I7�e Court further finds that the Property Settlelmrt of the parties
should be approved. y'' .
5. The Cou�-t further finds that tiie.allegations of the wife's Petition
for Dissolution of Marriage are true and that there has been an irretrievable
brnakdown of said marriage and that the Court should enter a judcyrent of
dissolution of the marriage of Zrese Iaros and Russell J. Iaros.
� � � � � � . . i: -. .
6. The'Court further finds thaf the Petitioner should have her fozmer
name of Irene Bates retored to.her.
IT IS, TF�REFI�RE, NNSIL]Ei�D, .ORDEF�D, ADJLJCX�D At�ID DECRE�D by the Caurt
that the �rriage of Zrene Iaros and Fh�ssell J. Iaros is heseby dissolved.
IT ZS FU?7P}�R ORDER�, ACJUIY.,�D �dD DEC'r2r:L.D by che Court"i1�at the Property
Settic�nt of the parties is hereby apprwed. — -
IT 15 F'URT'ti�t ORDERID, AA7UD� I�ID DECRF� b the Court that the Petitioner's
fonrer na�e of Zrene Bates is r y restor to hes.
,l9�' ��
JUDC�, GIBSOI�] CIF2CUIT �IJKI'