Divorce - Fritts, Ruth_7/31/1974�
f
-'--�,� ��
STATc OP INDIlaNt; )
COUNTY OF 41ARRICK � SS:
�r
IN 7HE :dARRIC,K CIr?CUIT CJURT
. . , ,:,.
IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF ) �o. C-74-293
;WILLIAM WOODS S�J � .
AND �� Y� �U' •1Ei:T EiaTi�Y
- ^��, , 1, ?!} _
RUTH WOODS. � �� g� 19�4 ,. ,
�
' �(%,�GIY, �I' �/ � uy(L �
` r"� Petitioner a�pear,��gkfFf°person and by counsel and!
, , c�"�, ;
surtc�ns having been returned for respondent and tt�e Court
being advised Lhat respondent was notiF;ed oP final hear•ing
�. __, ,
on Petitlon for Dissolution of Yiarriage, the Cour� heord
proof of petitioner, made tne foliosaing Findin�:; oP Fact
and Conclusions of Law: '
FIidDINGS OF FACT .
• 1. The Court herein finds that the wife, Ruth Sloocis, has
resided in Gibson County, Indiana, for more than three rtrontFis
and in the;State of Indiana for..more than:six months before
the.date of'ftl�ing �the petition herein and noa; resides at 717
First Street; Princeton, Indiana,, and r.eceives her mail,rural
route Generali•�Del ivery �there.� - . � •
2. The Court finds further that the hus6and ha-•resi�ed in
Gibson County, Indiana, for more than three months and in the
State of Indiana for more::than six months before the date of :
filing of this petition and no�.� resides at !�3< ;outh Jackson."-
Street, Oakland City, Indiana. �
3. The Court finds further tha* the �parties herein wer.e
married on September 2g� t973.• �
4. The Court finds further that the parties alere..separated
on October 31� 1973•,; . , _ .' . . �-
.�, . . , . , .. -
-- -- S:�Tha Cou�t �inus further that;the parti�,s have acquirea
no property during their mzrrizve.
��� 5:`TFie��C'ourtpfinos fui-ther that-there has�been �an irretrievable
• �.
breakdoam of the marrfaye 6etween the parties.
;
. ��_
.,
_
4
^ 1
J�d` \ -,
\Y
I i ���
�
. ��� ,
� . • •
�
� 7. The Court finds �urther that the parties hereto
.;
entered into an agreement on":July_ 23, ,1974 in order to settte•°._
' property H ghts between themselves and that the par,ttes herein`
desire�`to'�tncor�orete b'y reference into the Judgr„ent said �
agreement and to have said agrFement :�ade a pert of the
Judgment herein.
COt�CLUSIONS OF LqW
,�.i.. Ttie�Court conci��des thst the Court h�rein has jurisdletion
�_ : ,. .
ov�r the Petition for Uissolution of Marriage filed 'nereln..
� � �i_ TF,�, r,..._` __ _ • • _ .
- - ---..-.���� ���d� �ne marr�age between the .
parties should be dissolved because of irretrfevable breakdowr�. .,
=' 3. The Court concludes that the parties hereto entered�� �
an agreernent:�in this case.on July 23� 1974 to foreve� settl6 the,�
property N gh*_s between thcrselves and that sald agreement • •
should be incorporated into this Judgment by reference•and ts •
e `':.. - . ., n�.
� made'a�pa;t hereof: sa;d agreement includes but is not iimlted
� . . to :each .party re�turnin al t � � ' • �
,,
9 proherty belonging to.the other �
• par:ty.at the time of �fhe marriage, no property haVing"been
�
' acquired by th2 parties during the marr9are ��.� � - �
..a��� _� �:.�..h.�,_t;,;,,.. , . an� _, estorin� �
, the�former nartte of�:Ru"�'!; Fr�re4S"`�.;�-:«- � � �
- , . rocrenn.�w... � �� - _ - ` - . . . '
,�.
. , .84.1.: �. .. • �i\�l� ' .•y . . . .' ' . .. �
�'� ... JUDGMEP�T ' ", _ .
. IT IS.TNER�FU:E ORDEr;�D, ADJUDGE� �nd �J��REED that the -�
marriage�between��the pai�tie§ be and 9s hereby forever dissolved�' •
, that the agreement�entered into oy the parties on Juty 23. 1974::�-
be�incorporate�i by reference and become a pa�r. of th�i's Judgment :
her.ein, including but not:timited to the restoratlon to�respondent
of her former nar,ie of Ruth Fritts, and each of the�parties
returning to }the other any property belonging to said party ,.
, at the time,of the :�arriage, no property.having bEen ecqui.red;�:` ��
by the parties during th;s per. .
r-- - — - -
�-./��,�
0